Which of the following allows corporations to finance campaign ads without limit, provided they disclose contributions?

• A. Baker v. Carr
• B. Citizen's United v. FEC
• C. McConell v. FEC
• D. Bush v. Gore

Answer: (B)

The correct choice is significant as it stems from the landmark Supreme Court case, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, decided in 2010. This ruling established that corporations and unions can spend unlimited amounts of money on campaign advertisements, as it is considered a form of protected free speech under the First Amendment.

The ruling effectively dismantled previous restrictions on independent expenditures, allowing corporations to finance their own political advertising directly, as long as they disclose their contributions. This decision has had profound implications for campaign finance, leading to the rise of super PACs and a significant increase in the amount of money spent in elections.

This case is pivotal because it redefined the relationship between money and political expression, emphasizing that financial contributions are a means of exercising free speech. In contrast, the other options involve different issues related to voting rights, election processes, or presidential election disputes, rather than alterations to the regulations on campaign financing established by the Supreme Court.